Lindsay Davenport vs Na Li Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W L
Form
W W L W W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Davenport 2 - 0 Li
They have played 4 sets in total, with Davenport winning 4 and Li winning 0. The last match between Davenport and Li was at the Wismilak International - Bali, 17-09-2005, Semifinals, Hard with Lindsay Davenport getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 2 |
| Na Li | 0 |
Wismilak International - Bali(17-09-2005)
6
2
6
2
| Davenport | Stats | Li |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 2 |
| 48 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 48 | Titles | 15 |
| 79% (755-197) | Career Total W/L | 70% (402-169) |
| $1,869,625 | Career Prize Money | $12,713,039 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Lys PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Na Li
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 63% (41/65) | 1st Serve % | 62% (38/61) |
| 78% (32/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 33% (8/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 46% (28/61) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/65) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lindsay Davenport Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Marion Bartoli
Player
Lindsay Davenport
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Alisa Kleybanova
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Aleksandra Wozniak
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Renata Voracova
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
12
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Karolina Sprem
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
10
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Jill Craybas
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Vania King
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Na Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Na Li
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Yvonne Meusburger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Paula Kania
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Na Li
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Na Li
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Samantha Stosur
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Casey Dellacqua
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Na Li
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Jie Zheng
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79% (755/197) | Win/Loss | 70% (402/169) |
| 74% (1589/550) | Sets Win/Loss | 67% (872/434) |
| 60% (11605/7646) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (6813/5132) |
| 80% (398/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 73% (260/96) |
| 78% (122/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 69% (76/34) |
| 80% (156/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (30/20) |
| 80% (45/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (36/19) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 576 | Aces Total | 871 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 457 | Total Double Faults | 1314 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 290.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 461.09 |
| 60% (4457/7479) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19612/29098) |
| 72% (3141/4388) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (12471/19612) |
| 48% (1439/3025) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4610/9482) |
| 51% (537/1049) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1849/3779) |
| 48% (3673/7593) | Return Points Win % | 47% (13660/29265) |
| 80% (176/44) | Slam W/L | 73% (91/34) |
| 78% (95/27) | Masters W/L | 66% (114/59) |
| 90% (26/3) | Cups W/L | 83% (10/2) |
| 84% (300/59) | Main Tour W/L | 68% (147/69) |
| 75% (3/1) | Challenger W/L | 89% (40/5) |
| 72% (34/13) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 80% (750/937) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 71% (400/564) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (86/142) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (68/123) |
| 67% (163/244) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (103/173) |
| 93% (729/677) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (387/351) |
| 7% (729/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (387/35) |
| 35% (220/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (182/51) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
